RSM logo
Tropical Doctor

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Trop Doct 2008;38:243-244
doi:10.1258/td.2007.070125
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elussein, E. A
Right arrow Articles by Adam, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Short Reports

Clinical patterns and major causes of infertility among Sudanese couples

Elsir A Elussein *   Yagoub M Magid *   Maha M Omer *   Ishag Adam {dagger} 

* Khartoum Fertility Center, Khartoum; {dagger} Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, PO Box 102, Khartoum, Sudan

Correspondence to: Dr Ishag Adam, Khartoum Fertility Center, Khartoum, Sudan Email: ishagadam{at}hotmail.com


    SUMMARY
Go to previous sectionTop
 SUMMARY
Go to next sectionIntroduction
Go to next sectionPatients and method
Go to next sectionResults
Go to next sectionDiscussion
Go to next sectionReferences
 
An understanding of the medical causes of infertility is crucial in order to reduce incidences of Infertility and for improving the clinical management of infertility. Although there were much data on infertility in other African countries, no data exist on infertility in Sudan. Seven hundred and ten Sudanese couples were investigated for the infertility in Khartoum Fertility Center, Sudan: 443 (62.4%) had primary infertility and 267 (37.6%) had secondary infertility. The mean (standard deviation) duration of the infertility was 5.2 (4.3) years. A positive male factor alone was found in 257 (36.2%) couples and a female factor in 350 (49.3%) couples: eleven (1.5%) couples had a combination of male and female factors: and the cause of infertility was unexplained in 92 (13.0%) couples. Oligozoospermia and asthenozoospermia were factors responsible for 16.8% and 17.5% of male infertility, respectively. Failure of ovulation (60.3%) was the most common cause of female infertility. The study revealed a high proportion of secondary infertility and a greater contribution of the female factors to infertility.


    Introduction
Go to previous sectionTop
Go to previous sectionSUMMARY
 Introduction
Go to next sectionPatients and method
Go to next sectionResults
Go to next sectionDiscussion
Go to next sectionReferences
 
Infertility is a wide world problem, almost 15% of couples suffer from infertility.1 The World Health Organization reported that African couples have a pattern of infertility different from those in other developing regions or the developed countries. They are more likely to have: secondary infertility for a longer duration; a history of sexually transmitted diseases; or pregnancy complications.2 There are few studies on infertility in sub-Saharan Africa. Sub-Saharan countries tend not to research infertility because of economic reasons and, possibly, the psychological denial of the problem.35 The epidemiology of infertility is important for health researchers as well as for policy makers. A better understanding of the medical causes of infertility is therefore crucial for reducing the incidence of infertility and for the improvement of its clinical management. This report is necessary as, while there is a large amount of data on infertility in other African countries6,7 no data exist about infertility in Sudan, the biggest country in Africa with a population of 40 million.


    Patients and method
Go to previous sectionTop
Go to previous sectionSUMMARY
Go to previous sectionIntroduction
 Patients and method
Go to next sectionResults
Go to next sectionDiscussion
Go to next sectionReferences
 
We reviewed the medical files of infertile couples who presented to the Khartoum Fertility Center, Sudan, during March to December 2004. The data obtained included the type, duration and causes of infertility and the age of the couples involved. Couples were investigated if they failed to conceive after more than one year of unprotected sexual activity. Investigation of the couples included a detailed history and a physical examination. Semen was provided for investigation by masturbation in the centre (or at home in exceptional cases) after three days of abstinence and was investigated within one hour by the conventional manual method using a haemocytometer chamber for counting. Normal semen was taken as sperm count of 20 million and above with >50% motility (active) and >60% of normal morphology. For the female partner, in addition to the basic investigative reproductive hormone assays (LH, FSH, prolactin and day 21 progesterone), ultrasound scanning and laparoscopy or hysterosalpingoraphy (for diagnosis of tubal and uterine factors) were performed. In some cases hysteroscopy and saline infusion ultrasonography were also performed. The treatment was given according to the cause of the infertility. However, the centre provided optimum care and treatment which varied from the simple induction of ovulation and sperm retrieval to intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The study received ethical clearance from the Academy of Medical Sciences and Technology.


    Results
Go to previous sectionTop
Go to previous sectionSUMMARY
Go to previous sectionIntroduction
Go to previous sectionPatients and method
 Results
Go to next sectionDiscussion
Go to next sectionReferences
 
During the period of the study, 710 couples were investigated: 443 (62.4%) had primary infertility and 267 (37.6%) had secondary infertility. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) duration of infertility was 5.2 ± 4.3 years. Only 71 (10%) of the couples presented before two years of infertility. The mean ± SD age of the female partner at presentation was 34.4 ± 8.1 years.

Table 1 shows the relative male and female factors of the 710 investigated couples for the primary and secondary infertility. In 257 (36.2%) couples only the male factor was identified and in 350 (49.3%) infertility was due to female factors. There was no identified cause in 92 (13.0%) couples and infertility was due to male and female factors in 11 (1.5%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Type of infertility in Sudan

 
Infertility in men was primarily due to Azoospermia (43, 16.8%), oligzoospermia (45, 7.5%), asthenzoospermia (79, 30.7%) and mixed pathology (90, 35.0%) (Table 2). Ovulatory factors were the cause in 60.3% of the women: 20.9% were causes by tubal blockage and 18.8% by uterine factors (endometrial fibroids, polyps, congenital malformations and endometrial atrophy) (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Identified causes of infertility in Sudanese men

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Identified causes of infertility in Sudanese woman

 

    Discussion
Go to previous sectionTop
Go to previous sectionSUMMARY
Go to previous sectionIntroduction
Go to previous sectionPatients and method
Go to previous sectionResults
 Discussion
Go to next sectionReferences
 
This is the first published data on the pattern of infertility in Sudan. The study showed that 62.4% of the couples had primary infertility and 37.6% had secondary infertility. Among Tanzanian couples, Infertility was primary in 37.1% and secondary in 62.9%.5 In Nigeria, secondary infertility predominated (78.3%) according to one report4 and primary infertility in another.7 In a report from Ghana 40% of the couples suffered from primary and 60% from secondary infertility.6 Nevertheless, secondary infertility tends to predominate in African countries.2

Our study revealed that, in 257 (36.2%) infertility was due to male factor and 350 (49.3%) to female factors: there was no identified cause in 92 (13.0%) of the couples. In Tanzania, female-only factor infertility was identified in 65.9% of the couples, male-only factor infertility in 6.8%, male and female factors in 15.2% and unexplained factors in 12.1%.5 Olatunji and Sule-Odu reported that In Nigeria, the male factor was the only cause in 26.8%, the female factor in 51.8% and both male and female factors were contributory in 21.4%.4 Yet, Ikechebelu et al.7 reported a positive male-only factor in 133 (42.4%) and female-only in 81 (25.8%) couples in their report from Southern Nigeria. Idrisa and Ojiyi8 reported that in the Northern Nigeria the female infertility predominated. The male factor constituted 45% of infertility and tubal damage factor 23% of those diagnosed in a report from Ghana.6 In Mongolia 45.8% of couples suffered infertility due to a female factor and 25.6% due to a male factor: 9.8% of had no demonstrable cause: 18.8% had an infertility diagnosis in both partners.9 In our community, male infertility may be particularly problematic for men as both virility and fertility are seen as signs of manliness and male infertility is a potentially emasculating condition surrounded by secrecy and stigma.

In contrast to the previous reports from the central Sudan10 in this study, the ovulation failure was the most common cause for female infertility (60.3%) and the tubal occlusion was responsible for 20.9% of the female factor. Razzak et al.11 reported that ovulation disorders were the cause in 41% while tubal obstruction contributed to only 5% of cases of the female factor in Iraq. In South Africa, the most common causes of female infertility were ovulation disorders (41%) and, while tubal obstruction contributed to only 5% of cases, tubal factor infertility was overall the most common cause of infertility.12 In Nigeria, the most common female factor responsible for infertility was the tubal occlusion.12

This study carries an inherent biased factor as it was been carried out in a private centre among couples could afford the investigation. They might not be representative of the community. However, the study confirmed that there is a high proportion of secondary infertility and a relatively high proportion of female-only factors were involved.


    References
Go to previous sectionTop
Go to previous sectionSUMMARY
Go to previous sectionIntroduction
Go to previous sectionPatients and method
Go to previous sectionResults
Go to previous sectionDiscussion
 References
 

  1. Zargar AH, Wani AI, Masoodi SR, Laway BA, Salahuddin M. Epidemiologic and etiologic aspects of primary infertility in the Kashmir region of India. Fertil Steril 1997;68:637–43[Medline]
  2. Larsen U. Primary and secondary infertility in sub-Saharan Africa. Intern J Epidemiol 2000;23:285–91
  3. Cates W, Farley TM, Rowe PJ. Worldwide patterns of infertility: is Africa different? Lancet 1985;2:596–8[Medline]
  4. Olatunji AO, Sule-Odu AO. The pattern of infertility cases at a university hospital. West Afr Med J 2003;22:205–7
  5. Larsen U, Masenga G, Mlay J. Infertility in a community and clinic-based sample of couples in Moshi, Northern Tanzania. East Afr Med J 2006;83:10–17[Medline]
  6. Fiander A. Causes of infertility among 1000 patients in Ghana. Trop Doct 1990;20:137–8[Medline]
  7. Ikechebelu JI, Adinma JI, Orie EF, Ikegwuonu SO. High prevalence of male infertility in southeastern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynecol 2003;23:657–9
  8. Idrisa A, Ojiyi E. Pattern of infertility in North-Eastern Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynecol 2000;17:27–9
  9. Bayasgalan G, Naranbat D, Tsedmaa B. Clinical patterns and major causes of infertility in Mongolia. J Obstet Gynecol Res 2004;30:386–93
  10. Mirghani OA, Babiker MY. Experience with gynaecological laparoscopies in Wad Medani Hospital, Sudan. East Afri Med J 1999;76:390–95
  11. Razzak AH, Wais SA. The infertile couple: a cohort study in Duhok, Iraq. East Mediterr Health J 2002;8:234–8[Medline]
  12. Stewart-Smythe GW, van Iddekinge B. Lessons learned from infertility investigations in the public sector. South Afr Med J 2003;93:141–3[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elussein, E. A
Right arrow Articles by Adam, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

MDU Exam Doctor